4 ms·
It’s interesting to dismiss this criticism as “impossibly high standards” when VR as a market is clearly a disaster. The person you replied to is of the same op
by trefoiled 3y ago
It’s interesting to dismiss this criticism as “impossibly high standards” when VR as a market is clearly a disaster. The person you replied to is of the same opinion as the vast majority of consumers, who have either not purchased a headset or did, but now leave it in a closet gathering dust. VR clearly will not be viable on a massive scale until it takes a major leap forward.
- intrasight 3y agoWhen those major leaps occur, Apple should be well-positioned. Remember they play the long game. My office mate had Apple's first tablet 30 years ago - the Newton. And even further back - 40 years ago - Jobs said he didn't want the Mac to have a keyboard and mouse. He rightfully considered those to be a very artificial means of human-machine interface. His engineers made him understand that current tech didn't yet fulfill his dream. But that dream was eventually realized. Those major leaps will occur. Apple has the wherewithal the stay the course. I'll look at the first generation VR headset the way I looked at their first tablet 30 years ago. Or their first computer 40 years ago.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 3y agoWhat dream was eventually realized? We still use kb and mouse
- arc-in-space 3y agoI suppose he must mean touchscreens? Which are about as inhuman as it gets.
- intrasight 3y agoYes and no. Certainly the market thinks it's the best option at the moment.But certainly it won't be the interface we use in 20 years.