3 ms·
Yup, I read it, and I read it months ago too, it's come up a few times. What I'm saying is that it's absolutely possible to quickly and efficiently say those q
by tunesmith 3y ago
Yup, I read it, and I read it months ago too, it's come up a few times.
What I'm saying is that it's absolutely possible to quickly and efficiently say those quality thoughts that springs to mind, in a respectful manner. And yes, it is a skill people should learn because it gives you a superset of advantages compared to if you don't. You can talk to a wider slice of people, and learn more from them as well. It's not very time-consuming or laborious, either. If I'm able to communicate my thoughts to you in a respectful manner, why would I change to be brutal about it? Once you know both, you tend to see that the brutality, aside from its other disadvantages, is simply superfluous.
- Freebytes 3y agoYou hit the nail on the head, especially about the time-consuming aspect. People confuse honesty and respect. You can always be truthful while still maintaining respect and appreciation of others. "Did you like my singing?" Option A: "No. You sounded like an animal being slaughtered. If this is a hobby of yours, I would recommend a different one." Option B: "Not really." Option C: "It is not my style, but you sounded like your were enjoying yourself." Option D: "You really had a lot of passion. There were times you struggled, though, so you should record yourself and practice on those points. When you have everything ironed out, I would be happy to offer an honest critique again." This is going from rude responses to respectful responses. Option B is actually more honest than Option A, but is less 'brutal'. However, if a person is truly seeking a critique, you can offer one in detail, but it is probably better to ask if they are seeking your actual preferences or your critique in that type of situation.