3 ms·
This analysis is wrong because it is focusing on a limited number of high end chips. You can buy CPUs that cost a fraction of any of those listed that will abs
by sspiff 3y ago
This analysis is wrong because it is focusing on a limited number of high end chips.
You can buy CPUs that cost a fraction of any of those listed that will absolutely demolish even the best chips from 6 years ago today. All while consuming drastically less power for that performance as well.
Even mobile chips over 2 years old are within margin of error performance distance to those entry level Naples chips listed, at a fraction of the cost and power consumption.
I would not call that stagnation.
- anonymousDan 3y agoThanks, I was hoping someone would comment as to why the article might be wrong. I also wonder what the trends look like in terms of performance per watt?
- sspiff 3y agoIt's hard to say without actually testing the hardware with a power meter, since throttling plays such a big role and power budgets advertised are often just a single figure approximation of a much more complicated formula. I run a home server powered by a Ryzen 5800H, nominally a 45W part, but I've seen it maintain a power draw far higher than that for hours under sustained load.