3 ms·
Sure. But I wouldn't do that for 1.0 of the lang. It sounds quite feasible to add support for that in 1.x if the community needs it. There's a reasonable path t
by laserbeam 3y ago
Sure. But I wouldn't do that for 1.0 of the lang. It sounds quite feasible to add support for that in 1.x if the community needs it. There's a reasonable path to upgrade to http/2 while spending more effort into what's critical for the lang to get to 1.0.
[Edit] And it's quite feasible to decide later that http/2 was never needed for this usecase.
- brundolf 3y agoSure, but GP was saying "out of scope" in a way that sounded like "forever, for this use-case", not just "for 1.0". I may have misinterpreted