I've seen a lot of people wow'd and impressed by the AI, acting as if it's sentient etc whom would turn around in a second and argue that animals are flesh robo

I've seen a lot of people wow'd and impressed by the AI, acting as if it's sentient etc whom would turn around in a second and argue that animals are flesh robots powered purely by survival instincts. A lot of this is because I think it sort of wedges a knife into an area of our brain which makes us think it's similar to us. Look at this output, it's able to write about Shakespeare or summarize Beowulf or talk about these topics in a way I can understand. But ultimately it's an affirmative mirror; it will respond exactly as you prompt it. It cannot disagree with you or ask 'why' or synthesize the world beyond what it's told to do. And it's incredibly hard to get some people to understand this. Even harder when you have companies pushing this because it's trendy even as we see the issues of private data being leaked or the frays in the data sets appearing.