4 ms·
Which part is the "theft". They existed to make AI and behold, they did AI. You can argue they didn't open-source it, as their name suggests, but they also wer
by BulgarianIdiot 3y ago
Which part is the "theft". They existed to make AI and behold, they did AI.
You can argue they didn't open-source it, as their name suggests, but they also were denied a billion of funding that Musk kept promising until they were literally out of money.
What they did was a matter of survival. Of course they're not blameless in their actions now. They're clearly building a very powerful business. But they were put in this position. It was either this, or OpenAI wouldn't exist.