3 ms·
Yes, because the (((thought-leaders))) have been saying that OpenAI will let GPT to write all of their software from now on. And if they won't then that means L
by yreg 3y ago
Yes, because the (((thought-leaders))) have been saying that OpenAI will let GPT to write all of their software from now on. And if they won't then that means LLMs are incapable. /s
Also, there are reasons to not launch on both platforms at once even if the binaries were ready. E.g. if you want to space out onboarding new users. They are launching only in the US afterall.
- dang 3y agoI don't know what you meant by (((that bit))) but assuming you're aware what sort of trope it is: we ban accounts that play those games. Please don't post flamebait to HN.
- yreg 3y agoBy that bit I mean to object against a label "thought leaders". I don't know who they are supposed to be, but sounds to me about as ridiculous as complaining about "illuminati". Apparently I didn't chose the right way to denote it and shouldn't have reacted to that at all. To me actually the parent comment seems like bait - boiling down to "GPT is incapable, otherwise OpenAI would use it to generate the Android app along with the iOS app". Apologies, I should have written my comment in a better way.
- dang 3y agoOk! I was referring to something totally different - there was a period a couple of years ago when triple parens were used as an anti-semitic trope on the internet. I'm glad I was careful to put the word "assuming" in my GP comment because scolding people for something they didn't actually do really sucks. Still, other readers would make the same assumption so it's best to avoid that notation in HN comments in the future.