3 ms·
I think it's fair for the alt-righters that put this convention together to say they were excluded. Probably fair to exclude them too, but imo making their own
by HDThoreaun 3y ago
I think it's fair for the alt-righters that put this convention together to say they were excluded. Probably fair to exclude them too, but imo making their own con in reaction to being excluded seems like a reasonable decision. the rage bait stuff is lame though.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoWere they actually excluded, or did they feel excluded because they didn't like the new philosophy? I'm not sure if they were actual rules actually excluding them.
- philipkglass 3y agoThere weren't actual rules excluding them. Compare the "about" page for the more mainstream Worldcon with the one for BasedCon: https://www.worldcon.org/about-worldcon/ https://www.worldcon.org/about-worldcon/ https://www.basedcon.com/?page_id=85 https://www.basedcon.com/?page_id=85 BasedCon's "about" has hot takes on guns, socialism, abortion, etc. Worldcon's "about" doesn't say anything about those topics at all. Here's the Registration FAQ for next year's Worldcon in Glasgow: https://glasgow2024.org/get-involved/registration-faq/ https://glasgow2024.org/get-involved/registration-faq/ There are no hot-button American political topics mentioned either way there. The last time I was at a science fiction convention there was a wide variety of political views among attendees, just as there have been among Hugo-winning SF authors. BasedCon seems unusual not in what sort of views it permits but in what it explicitly rejects.
- manuelabeledo 3y agoI would think that they excluded themselves because of what they perceived as too much inclusion, which is ironic in a weird way.