> Maybe if you're familiar with something like Haskell Scala is more straightforward to decode? Only if it's a particular flavor of Scala I think. Even then th

> Maybe if you're familiar with something like Haskell Scala is more straightforward to decode? Only if it's a particular flavor of Scala I think. Even then there's so much "excess" added by Haskell-esque Scala you'll have to develop the skill of mapping from one to another. A simple but realtively easy example is sum types in Haskell are case classes in Scala.