3 ms·

Then if they have something to report on, report on it. As you point out, I think it's 100% fine, and indeed advisable, to be skeptical of people's motives. But

• 23B1 3y ago
  I think that public disclosure of publicly-traded companies is important so that shareholders can make informed decisions – so I don’t see why we wouldn’t require something similar out of elected leaders. And it’s not about prohibiting people from meeting, its about transparency in who and how they are influenced when in positions of public trust.
• mbgerring 3y ago
  This is reporting — that this meeting is taking place, but the agenda of that meeting can’t be known to the public, even though we will almost certainly be affected by the outcome, is important news.