It's a case that didn't have too much impact; the case did not have any implications for the famed Section 230. Still a unanimous decision is a little bit of a

It's a case that didn't have too much impact; the case did not have any implications for the famed Section 230. Still a unanimous decision is a little bit of a surprise for me. Given some of the current justices' penchant for judicial activism, I would've expected some to try.