Even with a structural disadvantage it may make sense to fight back. Yes, it's risky. But whether it's worth it, is everyone's own (moral, not engineering) choi

Even with a structural disadvantage it may make sense to fight back. Yes, it's risky. But whether it's worth it, is everyone's own (moral, not engineering) choice. And I don't have any illusion that just geeks can "save the world", but they can at least provide support in some areas, such as allowing journalists to communicate with activists. So you think the world would be a better place without any circumvention tools?