4 ms·
No, the user must be aware of it and decide. The real alternative is to not track at all. It's compliant, easy to implement, performant (the topic of the post)
by rakoo 3y ago
No, the user must be aware of it and decide.
The real alternative is to not track at all. It's compliant, easy to implement, performant (the topic of the post) and does the right thing
- littlecranky67 3y agoor use progressive escalation, like I.e. Apples AppStore guidelines. Get the consent banner when the user performs an action that requires storing the data (i.e in a cookie)
- andy_ppp 3y agoThat is your opinion, I think until login you should avoid setting cookies anyway and ask as part of that journey.
- rakoo 3y agoLogin cookies are not considerea tracking cookies, you don't need to ask for user consent for that
- flagrant_taco 3y agoI believe the argument here by the GP is that tracking cookies shouldn't be used at all until the user logs in. No idea what that would do to any business value Airbnb gets from tracking, but the idea is that the lost analytics data is outweighed by the benefit of removing new user friction.