3 ms·
> It's just surprising that audiobook listeners haven't developed a distinct taste apart from book readers. Sample size of 1, but: my taste in audiobooks does
by archon 3y ago
> It's just surprising that audiobook listeners haven't developed a distinct taste apart from book readers.
Sample size of 1, but: my taste in audiobooks does not perfectly overlap with my taste in dead-trees books. My audiobook library skews much more to the fiction end of things, while my dead-trees library contains more nonfiction. I also use audiobooks to re-read books I've already read.
I enjoy the performance aspect of the audiobooks in its own right. The narrator makes or breaks my experience of the book, to such an extent that I have returned Audible books that _I have already read in dead-trees form and knew I liked_ because the narration was bad. I also suspect some of my favorite audiobooks would have ended up in the "donate/throw out" pile if I'd read them first on paper.
- dalbasal 3y agoMe too, more or less. Your sample size if one is probably right. Yet... audiobooks' are still pretty much just books. There is no theatre-2-film difference between the mediums. It's more like hardbacks and soft covers.
- buu709 3y agoIt's not exactly main stream but there are groups like Graphic Audio doing great work that will probably lead down this road. They do a full cast audiobook with sound effects, music, etc. and they tend to be altered slightly to work in the medeium - would not be surprised if the differences continue to grow.