I sympathise with this view in general and with her situation having kids she won't be able to see for 10 years. But us I understand in this specific case she

I sympathise with this view in general and with her situation having kids she won't be able to see for 10 years. But us I understand in this specific case she played an important role in driving one of her employees to suicide, and her fraud concerning her tech is not just financial, it was giving people false information about their health, including cancer - which is close to violence to me. In fact my sympathy with this case is not that it is too harsh for a small crime (fraud), it is that the crime is so huge that she must have been psychopath and might deserve mental treatment. Genuinely how can someone live with giving hundred of thousands of people false health information based on a test they know is garbage?