Instead of dropping conspiracies one should ask for proof. The fact you couldn't name a single male CEO who had a similar level of Fraud should be proof enough

Instead of dropping conspiracies one should ask for proof. The fact you couldn't name a single male CEO who had a similar level of Fraud should be proof enough the court system treated this fairly-ish compared to past levels of fraud. This wasn't just product fraud. It wasn't just money lost. Non-investors had their lives ruined from wrong medical advice being given. People died as a result. I think the bhopal disaster is a rough comparison for how gross negligance that cannot be attributed to 'mistakes' do lead to convictions. https://www.goldmanprize.org/blog/eight-people-convicted-on-criminal-charges-for-1984-bhopal-disaster/ https://www.goldmanprize.org/blog/eight-people-convicted-on-...