> This is not a good reason to be anti-controlled burn. You said yourself that this was due to negligence by the USFS You're not contradicting anything, that's

> This is not a good reason to be anti-controlled burn. You said yourself that this was due to negligence by the USFS You're not contradicting anything, that's literally the topic of this subthread. From the GGP: > We need to acknowledge that the solutions will cause less overall harm than not implementing them, but also recognize that the harms from the solutions may fall unevenly, and find ways to socialize the damage those solutions cause, rather than leave that damage on the powerless.