Hey SilverBirch, I'm the author of PandasAI. In terms of the naming, that's a very good point, and I must confess I didn't even consider that when I published t

Hey SilverBirch, I'm the author of PandasAI. In terms of the naming, that's a very good point, and I must confess I didn't even consider that when I published the repo. It just made sense to me, since the goal was to add AI on the top of pandas, to call it "PandasAI" (pandas + AI). For it was more of a tribute to the library, but I totally get your point, and I thank you for pointing it out. I'm trying to reach out the pandas founder, and I'll definitely change the name of the repo if he prefers to. As of the quality of the output, we are constantly working on improving the quality of it. It provides good enough results in most of the cases, but it still suffers from some hallucinations, although we have already fixed many either programmatically or with prompt engineering. As of the dataframe, we don't pass the whole df, but only the head and 5 columns with shuffled data (also redacting the sensitive ones). Any questions, feel free to ask!