> The hammer did indeed cost $435. If the government wanted to buy another one, the contractor would have charged them an extra $435. What are you basing this

> The hammer did indeed cost $435. If the government wanted to buy another one, the contractor would have charged them an extra $435. What are you basing this on? If I buy a gaming console bundled with a game, you're saying that implies I have no other option to purchase the game separately? Is there a leap of logic here or did I miss something in the story?