3 ms·
Correct, although :not() had a massive upgrade only a couple of years ago with complex selectors support. Prior to the change you could only pass a "simple sel
by samwillis 3y ago
Correct, although :not() had a massive upgrade only a couple of years ago with complex selectors support.
Prior to the change you could only pass a "simple selector" that only matched against the one node, such as :not(.something).
However you can now do :not(ul > li p.something)