4 ms·
Can you really not see how this will automate harm at massive parallelized scale? Even if you're nearsighted you can see how the internet will in short order b
by flangola7 3y ago
Can you really not see how this will automate harm at massive parallelized scale?
Even if you're nearsighted you can see how the internet will in short order be rendered useless by fake real-time interaction and digital malice. Look at how much automated ssh poking you get on an IP address. Look at how much email you receive without a comprehensive spam filter (it's much more than shows up in your Gmail spam folder). If we combine that level of relentless volume and speed with moderate skills at hacking, fraud, influence campaigns, abuse, and so on, the internet will break.
Look at the all the plugins GPT-4 has already. Do you really think if a system with those capabilities, with evil intent, running millions of threads, wouldn't cause untold levels of harm? If not, then at which point do you push for regulation? Do you wait until anyone can build a literal terminator in their basement? Openai is already working on robotic control models, so that's not likely not far off.
All I see are mindless silicon valley tech-optimists who can't see the forest for the trees.
- Grazester 3y agoWe already get spammed and hammered by bots without ai so? Did we manage to somehow regulate away existing systems to stop this? No, so why put ai behind a bunch of regulation. Maybe in a dystopia we have ai judges...wait he already have judges using shitty software for sentencing. You want to further regulate what I can build in my basement?
- yunwal 3y ago> Did we manage to somehow regulate away existing systems to stop this? No, but other countries have. We just don't do regulation because we're America or something (and because the FCC has been gutted). No European country has the same level of spam phone calls that we do.