3 ms·
I somewhat agree. I don't mind if true falsehoods/spam is removed. The problem was, the "anti vax" label was applied to far too much, including things that were
by nomel 3y ago
I somewhat agree. I don't mind if true falsehoods/spam is removed. The problem was, the "anti vax" label was applied to far too much, including things that were later found to be true.
The article I was looking for was about intravascular injection of the vaccine, and its possible relation to adverse effects, which now has merit in 2023 [1].
[1] https://pure.hud.ac.uk/en/publications/inadvertent-injection-of-covid-19-vaccine-into-deltoid-muscle-vas https://pure.hud.ac.uk/en/publications/inadvertent-injection...
- Phil_Latio 3y ago"remains at the injection side" was one of the more blatant lies. The funniest lie was "a corona virus outbreak of a novel strain in close distance to a biolab which does experiments on corona viruses ... is without a doubt of natural origin!"
- nomel 3y ago> "remains at the injection side" was one of the more blatant lies. Correct: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313234/