4 ms·
Much of the "antivax garbage" turned out to be true. In hindsight, do you still believe that censoring true but inconvenient information is morally acceptable?
by Danjoe4 3y ago
Much of the "antivax garbage" turned out to be true. In hindsight, do you still believe that censoring true but inconvenient information is morally acceptable?
- berkle4455 3y ago[flagged]
- edgyquant 3y agoThey did not say all
- berkle4455 3y agoHow about none of it.
- AlecSchueler 3y agoThey also gave no reason to believe the "most" claim. What actually are the things that were proven to be true that were censored as misinformation?
- WillPostForFood 3y agoTruth is messy. The vaccine is an amazing achievement and saved many lives. Understating the health risks to young men (myocarditis), and overstating the efficacy fed the anti-vaxxers, and was a disservice to science and healthcare.
- f6v 3y agoAnd we haven’t even talked about the prevention paradox.
- suoduandao2 3y agoyou're avoiding the question.
- berkle4455 3y agoThe fuck I am, which antivax conspiracy theor(ies) were actually proven true?
- suoduandao2 3y agoThat in some patients there might be adverse health effects from the vaccine. That the us funded gain of function research in novel coronaviruses. That the virus would mutate faster than the vaccine rollout and Covid would go seasonal. And you’re still avoiding the question.
- digging 3y agoHow much? Do you have any links to discussions or data that were against covid vaccination and turned out to be truthful and useful? I'm really curious because I've never heard of this in my personal information bubble, despite trying to widen it as much as I can.
- f6v 3y agoIt’s not inconvenient and more importantly not information. It’s annoying and not based on facts. I’d love to see any actual research done at a molecular biology lab that’d back an anti-vax fantasy. And then there’s the whole epidemiology level…
- surgical_fire 3y ago> Much [Citation Needed]
- bunbun69 3y agoImma need a source