4 ms·
The article makes assertions about Sam's intentions being negative without acknowledging the possibility that he actually meant what he said and wants regulatio
by bostonsre 3y ago
The article makes assertions about Sam's intentions being negative without acknowledging the possibility that he actually meant what he said and wants regulation because he thinks it is best for humanity. I don't understand all of the one sided hate for his statements. Say he did actually want to do what was best for humanity, how should he have acted differently in that meeting with congress? It seems entirely plausible that he is trying to do what is best for humanity and we just don't know whether he wants to put up a regulatory moat behind him or not.
- stephc_int13 3y agoHe might be convinced of his own discourse, but this is strangely aligned with the interests of his own company. We should remember how "open" OpenAI really is. The funny business started at this point.
- otterley 3y ago> He might be convinced of his own discourse, but this is strangely aligned with the interests of his own company. To be fair, that's not uncommon - people often choose to work for or lead companies whose values they are aligned with personally.