2 ms·
They're not arguing that they're better than police, they're saying that police have protections other people don't, and those protections are the only reason t
by pc86 3y ago
They're not arguing that they're better than police, they're saying that police have protections other people don't, and those protections are the only reason they feel comfortable kicking doors down. You're very, very unlikely to find some private security guy willing to kick a door down for some trading cards, because pretty much the first time they're wrong about it they're going to jail. You don't get qualified immunity as private security.
And that's an awfully long paragraph when "no" would have sufficed just fine.
- midjji 3y agoThose protections are not the only reason the police are comfortable doing things like that, those protections are there, because the justice system could not get police to stop doing that regardless, and in extraordinarily rare cases its justified.