3 ms·
I’d rather them focus on getting their hosted solution/api on par with Automatic. It needs control net, it needs seamless images. And all the other goodies that
by jonplackett 3y ago
I’d rather them focus on getting their hosted solution/api on par with Automatic. It needs control net, it needs seamless images. And all the other goodies that are now pretty standard.
I like a hosted solution. Can we just make it much better please? If I am paying you to host a service I don’t want to also have to go an give my labour to create the software. That’s why I wanted a hosted service in the first place.
- naillo 3y agoPeople keep hyping this automatic UI but having tried it it's honestly so awful. Can't believe people are saying it's better than dreamstudio
- CuriouslyC 3y agoThe UI is awful, the functionality is not.
- nickthegreek 3y agoFor serious generation control, nothing else comes remotely close. It is the most impressive github project I have every installed tbh. The flexibility of the system is unmatched in the image gen space. It feels like I am back in the 90s.
- jonplackett 3y agoAgree the UI is not good. But dream studio also quite poor. But the functionality of automatic is too notch. SD without control net is now totally obsolete.