3 ms·

Asymmetric Cryptographic Commitments

• h2odragon 3y ago
  Nice resource. Meta question: Can I trust cryptographic schemes that are too clever for me to understand? We're taking things on faith too often already; much simpler things bite us like "the CPU's random number generator works and is actually being used."
• user6723 3y ago
  [flagged]
  • some_furry 3y ago
    The furry art is working as intended, then.
  • Kye 3y ago
    Half the startups, frameworks, and programming languages out there have fursonas these days. Sit down.
  • DonHopkins 3y ago
    Hey, at least he's not a SovCit! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82JqvIozLk4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82JqvIozLk4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZxMzcFJ-Lc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZxMzcFJ-Lc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_NHHYfAUbQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_NHHYfAUbQ
  • fao_ 3y ago
    Good :) I thought Hackers used to believe in meritocracy. That someone could be more than their appearance. But modern (self-proclaimed) "Hackers" seem to be exactly the opposite.