3 ms·
LinkedIn lost the HiQ case. Your GC claiming it’s a win doesn’t change that you lost, repeatedly, in multiple courts of law: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi
by mcenedella 3y ago
LinkedIn lost the HiQ case. Your GC claiming it’s a win doesn’t change that you lost, repeatedly, in multiple courts of law:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn
- foolswisdom 3y agoAccording to that wiki page, the courts eventually did rule that HiQ violated LinkedIn's terms of service, and a settlement agreement was reached.
- henryfjordan 3y agoLinkedin lost on the CFAA claims, there were others that they did not lose.
- noizejoy 3y ago> LinkedIn lost the HiQ case. Your GC claiming it’s a win doesn’t change that you lost, repeatedly, in multiple courts of law That would appear to be false, since after appeals, there was a settlement wich would seem to make it pretty clear that hiQ lost: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-proposed-settlement-landmark-scraping-case https://www.natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-...