4 ms·
> Functionally speaking, there's no reason I couldn't be on OSX Tiger or Windows 2000. On the Mac side I think I'd go up to at least 10.5/10.6 for its native v
by kitsunesoba 3y ago
> Functionally speaking, there's no reason I couldn't be on OSX Tiger or Windows 2000.
On the Mac side I think I'd go up to at least 10.5/10.6 for its native virtual desktop implementation (Spaces) that's actually better than modern Spaces by way of being a 2D grid instead of a single row.