3 ms·
> and will not be rectified under the "just train it more bro" refrain of AI evangelicals. You made a good point up until then but this kind of remark incredib
by bgirard 3y ago
> and will not be rectified under the "just train it more bro" refrain of AI evangelicals.
You made a good point up until then but this kind of remark incredibly condescending and dismissive of other people's viewpoint. It's also quite possible that you're both right. That we'll need more training and new architecture breakthroughs. You could have left it at that you didn't think it would be solved by more training.
- IIAOPSW 3y agoI suppose it was not entirely clear that the viewpoint I'm mocking with "just train it more bro" is the extreme end of evangelists. The people who seem to believe LLM's are proof that we have fundamentally cracked the principle of cognition in the form of the neural network, and that there is nothing more to figure out other than just training it more, bro. We've all met a trainitmore bro. They are about as tedious as the statistical parrot parrots. Both of these extreme positions deserve some amount of dismissive mocking imo.