3 ms·

Why is this truth so painful for many to hear?

JohnFen 3y ago
It's not painful, and everyone's been hearing it since it was ongoing. But the extent and severity of it was also greatly exaggerated for political purposes.
- willcipriano 3y ago
  I didn't realize we were talking about January 6th.
- s1artibartfast 3y ago
  I think extent and severity are relative to the expectations of the individual. EG What do you think is extensive and severe? There are many course of Metro cities where businesses are still damaged and boarded up 3 years later.
  - JohnFen 3y ago
    I lived near one of the areas that got a ton of media attention. Comparing what a certain breed of pundits were saying about it with what I could plainly see with my own two eyes showed that the pundits were mostly talking nonsense. I'm not saying that there was no property damage or unrest. There most certainly was. but it was far more limited in area, and far less intense, than many were describing. "Cities are burning" is one of those absurd things. Nothing even close to that happened.
  - MisterBastahrd 3y ago
    I think some people have an incentive to exaggerate it for political reasons. My father believes that the entire country is embroiled in an unmitigated crime wave because he gets his news from Fox and Youtube. Every time I talk to him he whines about how "the country isn't the same as how I grew up anymore." This is a man who lives closer to the country than the city. It gives him a justification for turning his brain off and voting the way that he does, because in his mind, he's protecting the nation by preventing what he believes to be the liberal dream: allowing young, black men to run around and commit crimes with reckless abandon to bring about the end of capitalism.
selimthegrim 3y ago
Allenrb above is disputing you.
GiorgioG 3y ago
As an independent voter, it's obvious why. When you become a member of one of these two parties, you're part of the team, and generally you're going to assume the best of your team's intentions, their media coverage and so on. And you'll think the worst of the other side's intentions, media, and so on. I think plenty of both sides' positions are valid and others completely fucking insane.

It's not painful, and everyone's been hearing it since it was ongoing. But the extent and severity of it was also greatly exaggerated for political purposes.

willcipriano 3y ago
I didn't realize we were talking about January 6th.
s1artibartfast 3y ago
I think extent and severity are relative to the expectations of the individual. EG What do you think is extensive and severe? There are many course of Metro cities where businesses are still damaged and boarded up 3 years later.
- JohnFen 3y ago
  I lived near one of the areas that got a ton of media attention. Comparing what a certain breed of pundits were saying about it with what I could plainly see with my own two eyes showed that the pundits were mostly talking nonsense. I'm not saying that there was no property damage or unrest. There most certainly was. but it was far more limited in area, and far less intense, than many were describing. "Cities are burning" is one of those absurd things. Nothing even close to that happened.
- MisterBastahrd 3y ago
  I think some people have an incentive to exaggerate it for political reasons. My father believes that the entire country is embroiled in an unmitigated crime wave because he gets his news from Fox and Youtube. Every time I talk to him he whines about how "the country isn't the same as how I grew up anymore." This is a man who lives closer to the country than the city. It gives him a justification for turning his brain off and voting the way that he does, because in his mind, he's protecting the nation by preventing what he believes to be the liberal dream: allowing young, black men to run around and commit crimes with reckless abandon to bring about the end of capitalism.

selimthegrim 3y ago

Allenrb above is disputing you.

GiorgioG 3y ago

As an independent voter, it's obvious why. When you become a member of one of these two parties, you're part of the team, and generally you're going to assume the best of your team's intentions, their media coverage and so on. And you'll think the worst of the other side's intentions, media, and so on. I think plenty of both sides' positions are valid and others completely fucking insane.