> SpaceX didn't start from zero (former NASA talent) So to be considered 'starting from zero' a company needs to first create its own humans in a lab? > isn't

> SpaceX didn't start from zero (former NASA talent) So to be considered 'starting from zero' a company needs to first create its own humans in a lab? > isn't funded entirely by private industry (gov grants and leases) Nobody claimed it was. > Got a link for the most reliable rocket ever? Not on my right now, but it just had 200 successful missions in a row. There is a link somewhere about statical methods of reliability and Falcon 9 is on top of that list. Even by just looking at simple % probability they are on top. I don't have the link at hand but if I can find it later Ill add it. > Astronomers aren't too happy with StarLink, nor pedestrians with Tesla FSD beta being open to any driver with more money than sense. So in order t ob considered successful every single person on the plant needs to love you? > Musk's track record is heavily spotted. We can celebrate the successes together without turning a blind eye to the problems. I am not doing that. Not everything has to be perfect to consider something a success. That a ridiculous standard.