3 ms·
I matters which court handles the case. For instance Hamburg would always be on the, how should I put it, the evil corporate side. Munich recently showed to be
by lakomen 3y ago
I matters which court handles the case. For instance Hamburg would always be on the, how should I put it, the evil corporate side.
Munich recently showed to be on the people's side.
And Leipzig apparently has some corrupt judges. How else can one explain this ruling if not corruption? Which is weird because people in Eastern Germany are more humane than those in western Germany. But apparently also more needy of money.
Who were the judges or was it just one judge and what was their/his/her history, that's what I'd find interesting.
For me this means, boycott Sony, which already lost my support with the trash TV from 2015. But screwing with our liberties on that level, I use quad9 as my default resolver, also because I like to read censored Russian media to have both sides' stories.
If I had the money I'd support quad9 in their struggle.
Also the audacity of the Leipzig court. The arrogance, unbelievable.
- LeanderK 3y agoas someone living in germany this is absolutely not my impression about courts deciding differently and e.g. siding with "evil corporate side". I also doubt it's corruption, maybe just a smart pick of the district to maximise the chance of judges seemed sympathetic (and completely unknowledgeable of technology). > Which is weird because people in Eastern Germany are more humane than those in western Germany. But apparently also more needy of money. Also a weird statement to make
- mardifoufs 3y agoI think he was specifically talking about the Hamburg court w.r.t siding with evil corporations.