I wonder is this one more biologically plausible than deep backpropagation? I know that Geoffrey Hinton thinks backpropagation isn't biologically plausible and

I wonder is this one more biologically plausible than deep backpropagation? I know that Geoffrey Hinton thinks backpropagation isn't biologically plausible and he made forward-forward training which is more plausible but worse. Maybe the one in this paper could bridge the gap?