3 ms·

I want more than just accessory dwelling units. I'd be excited to see, like, properties where the front yard is replaced with 4 parking spots and 4 of these 500

I want more than just accessory dwelling units. I'd be excited to see, like, properties where the front yard is replaced with 4 parking spots and 4 of these 500+ sq ft houses are put with each other pointing to a shared courtyard or something on a standard quarter-to-half acre plot. I don't think the big house needs to be there at all!

shagie 3y ago
That represents a more substantial change to the property. Subdividing may not be possible, significant changes to sewer, electrical and water metering. If you've got a parking lot that is shared then there is more of a challenging for its maintenance (e.g. condo fees) which represents more overhead. In the SF world, going from RH-1 to RH-1S is is a much easier change than RH-1 to RM-3. Subdividing an existing lot further can get into difficulty in some areas with minimum parcel sizes. For example, in Chicago https://secondcityzoning.org/zones/ https://secondcityzoning.org/zones/ you can't have a parcel smaller than 1,650 sq ft. Switching from owner occupied property to something that is a commercial apartment structure can also impact the financial security of a household (you can't evict me from the house I own vs falling behind on rent because of a layoff). We do need higher density and less impacting houses - but this isn't a simple "tear down the house and build four smaller one" changes for most urban and suburban places.
- t-writescode 3y ago
  > but this isn't a simple "tear down the house and build four smaller one" changes for most urban and suburban places. That's fine. I recognize that legislation has been adjusted by numerous forces to make this as hard as possible. It's still what I want, as long as it's safe to live in places like this. Suburbia is killing us and wasting so very much for all of us.

3 ms·

I want more than just accessory dwelling units. I'd be excited to see, like, properties where the front yard is replaced with 4 parking spots and 4 of these 500

by t-writescode 3y ago

shagie 3y ago
That represents a more substantial change to the property. Subdividing may not be possible, significant changes to sewer, electrical and water metering. If you've got a parking lot that is shared then there is more of a challenging for its maintenance (e.g. condo fees) which represents more overhead. In the SF world, going from RH-1 to RH-1S is is a much easier change than RH-1 to RM-3. Subdividing an existing lot further can get into difficulty in some areas with minimum parcel sizes. For example, in Chicago https://secondcityzoning.org/zones/ https://secondcityzoning.org/zones/ you can't have a parcel smaller than 1,650 sq ft. Switching from owner occupied property to something that is a commercial apartment structure can also impact the financial security of a household (you can't evict me from the house I own vs falling behind on rent because of a layoff). We do need higher density and less impacting houses - but this isn't a simple "tear down the house and build four smaller one" changes for most urban and suburban places.
- t-writescode 3y ago
  > but this isn't a simple "tear down the house and build four smaller one" changes for most urban and suburban places. That's fine. I recognize that legislation has been adjusted by numerous forces to make this as hard as possible. It's still what I want, as long as it's safe to live in places like this. Suburbia is killing us and wasting so very much for all of us.