3 ms·
Users with an older smartphone on a slow connection could fail to run the script even if it's not disabled, if it's a separate network request.
by danielheath 3y ago
Users with an older smartphone on a slow connection could fail to run the script even if it's not disabled, if it's a separate network request.
- bhouston 3y ago> Users with an older smartphone on a slow connection could fail to run the script even if it's not disabled, if it's a separate network request. Hmm... technically correct, but I wonder if this is statistically relevant? Remember that I am currently collecting 30K browser samples per day. I'd have to miss 300 samples in a day this way for it to cause an error of 1%.
- superkuh 3y agoFrom what kind of sites? The kind that know and care about WebGPU support enough to include your iframe? That's some heavy selection bias if my assumption is true. Not a lot of low end smart phones visiting the kind of person that runs that kind of site.
- bhouston 3y agoI list the "supporters" of https://web3dsurvey.com https://web3dsurvey.com prominently on the homepage.
- superkuh 3y agoThat's what I figured. So that supports the idea that it's only measuring a very skewed set of visitors from Webgl, JS, and gfx designer type sites. I'd put the iframe on my very non-JS, non-webgl, non-gfx sites to skew the other way but I don't put JS scripts on sites.
- arp242 3y agoBut then it wouldn't report anything, and assuming those cases are roughly representative for cases where it does work, it doesn't really skew the results.