4 ms·
It is important, when ironically agreeing with someone, that the pseudo-agreement expresses your supposed shortcomings. Otherwise you’re just legitimately agre
by jakear 3y ago
It is important, when ironically agreeing with someone, that the pseudo-agreement expresses your supposed shortcomings.
Otherwise you’re just legitimately agreeing, but snarkily (and weakly).
- emodendroket 3y agoHey if you want to wholeheartedly embrace a worldview so nihilistic it doesn't have an answer for why we should try and stop people from doing mass murder, go nuts.
- jakear 3y agoAh. The non-sequitur approach to debate. Charming. If you can’t see the difference between allowing a plant to naturally spread and mass murder, I pray for those around you.
- emodendroket 3y agoYou were saying that mass extinction was no big deal, not “allowing a plant to spread,” and the reasoning you apparently embrace would in fact lead to that exact absurd result, so it is not a non sequitur.