3 ms·
> Europol doesn't knock on your door when you train a model on data that doesn't meet the requirements. This is probably designed to make countries introduce la
by rad_gruchalski 3y ago
> Europol doesn't knock on your door when you train a model on data that doesn't meet the requirements. This is probably designed to make countries introduce laws which will hold Google/OpenAI etc. accountable for their services so they can't just shrug and say "ouppsy, it's not our fault the AI did it".
Your use of “probably” is quite telling. Probably, as in, maybe not, maybe yes, who knows. As the act is phrased today, anyone who publishes a certain type of model, or a derivative of such, is a subject to certain legal obligations. Do you want to risk that Europol or any other task force knocks on your door, or hope every time that you slip under the radar?
Those acts, together with the CRA, are so vague that a lot of people will operate in a grey area. So maybe nobody knocks on your door for a year. Or two. Or five. But when they knock, good luck defending yourself from a legal action based on laws written by people who had so little idea they had to leave so many vague points open to interpretation depending on who doesn’t like you to what extent.
- mrtksn 3y agoI say probably because I'm not lawyer and that's not how EU works. People appear to be extracting drama, just like with the GDPR.
- rad_gruchalski 3y ago> that's not how EU works Today. > People appear to be extracting drama Makes sense considering that the drama influences subsequent reviews and changes.
- mrtksn 3y agoLet's worry about the imaginary future in the future.
- rad_gruchalski 3y agoWhile being selective about the problems we apply this reasoning to.
- zosima 3y agoWhy not apply this principle when making laws?