3 ms·
1 -- I don't see what you're trying to imply, could you come out and say it? 2 -- Actually, the publishers do have a lot of power. The universities are stuck i
by bo1024 15y ago
1 -- I don't see what you're trying to imply, could you come out and say it?
2 -- Actually, the publishers do have a lot of power. The universities are stuck in a bad equilibrium (in the game theory sense) -- if any of them individually deviates (by not subscribing to popular/restrictive journals and not publishing in them), that university is going to be the one to get hurt.
The only way out for universities is if they all cooperate and decide to ditch the restrictive journals. There are movements toward this right now (against Elsevier, for instance), but it's very difficult to gain traction. You can't just pick up the red phone to every university president and say, "hey guys, stop publishing in these journals, I set up a whole different process over here!" The journals have the prestige, so they have the power for now.
- zupreme 15y agoResponse to #1: I don't know any more about it than you do, with any degree of certitude. But I do know there's more at stake than protecting publishers. Response to #2: Good points. But don't forget that the government has the "Power of the Purse". If they tie funding to open access to papers, then some amazing things will start to happen.