4 ms·
I mean one of the beauty parts of git has always been that you can and, under ideal best practices, should have more than one place to put your code with the di
by jamal-kumar 3y ago
I mean one of the beauty parts of git has always been that you can and, under ideal best practices, should have more than one place to put your code with the distributed nature of it
- willsmith72 3y agoI dunno about "should", that feels like overkill. Expecting to get something like a 99.99% SLA shouldn't be unreasonable to expect out of a hosted solution
- jamal-kumar 3y agoA seperate git remote isn't incredibly unreasonable either - Even if it's just something on localhost in case of scenarios like this one Github being down for a bit shouldn't disrupt your work flow
- beardog 3y agoThe value add for Github is mostly the issue/PR interface and actions.
- Karellen 3y agoBut also, and more relevantly here, git is designed to be usable entirely offline. And if you do need to have some connection with remotes, git allows you to do so extremely sporadically if your network connectivity, or remote availability, is limited.
- anaganisk 3y agoBut currently that's not the beauty part of GitHub, it's the actions, discoverability and other features not part of Git.