3 ms·
I empathize with that issue, especially the underpaid part, but superficially that work is still a type of value exchange based on consent: you do the labeling,
by dahwolf 3y ago
I empathize with that issue, especially the underpaid part, but superficially that work is still a type of value exchange based on consent: you do the labeling, you get paid (poorly).
Yet for the issue I discussed, there's no value exchange at all. There's no permission or compensation for the people that have done the actual work of producing the training material.
- precompute 3y agoOh yeah. And labeling it as an "AI" further obfuscates it. But apart from small gestures catered to people whose work is very "unique" / identifiable, no one else will get a kickback. They only need to kick the ball further for a couple more years and then it'll become a non-issue as linkrot takes over. Or maybe they use non-public domain stuff, maybe they have secret deals with publishers. Heck, sometimes even google doesn't pay people for introducing new languages to their translation thingy. https://restofworld.org/2023/google-translate-sorani-kurdish-volunteers/ https://restofworld.org/2023/google-translate-sorani-kurdish...