I would interpret this for this scenario as "If you make (reasonably original) graphics for a theme, you do not need to release the graphics as GPLv2 if you rel

I would interpret this for this scenario as "If you make (reasonably original) graphics for a theme, you do not need to release the graphics as GPLv2 if you release the graphics standalone. If you, however, release the graphics as a part of the theme, you need to put the graphics under GPLv2 aswell". The mail quoted at http://wordpress.org/news/2009/07/themes-are-gpl-too/ http://wordpress.org/news/2009/07/themes-are-gpl-too/ classified the images and css as standalone works. They then concluded that the standalone works did not fall under GPL2. But the excerpt in the parent seems to state that these actually must be GPLv2:ed if bundled with the derivative work, no? So my interpretation is that the disclaimer is in conflict with the licence, since the licence actually requires you to GPLv2 standalone work when bundling with derivative. (IANAL)