3 ms·
This feels intentionally confusing/clickbaity. It sounds like they'll only force people to upgrade to a security-patched version of Windows 10, not to Windows 1
by brundolf 3y ago
This feels intentionally confusing/clickbaity. It sounds like they'll only force people to upgrade to a security-patched version of Windows 10, not to Windows 11, but it's framed in such a way to make you assume the latter (and get upset about it)
I've started mentally filtering the theregister.com links I see on here, because they often seem to be this way.
- nerdjon 3y agoYeah that is 100% a clickbait headline and it got me to click, but thankfully it got me to click to the comments instead of the article so I did not reward this behavior. Forcing a security patch vs forcing an update to Windows 11 is massively different. I agree on theregister links, it feels like every time I see an article from them its intentionally misleading. Edit: What really makes it seem like a clickbait headline is the "wether they like it or not" which heavily implies this will be a negative update to Windows 11 (or some other unwanted change) not a security fix.
- atlas_hugged 3y agoThe Register is kind of known for this style of mimicking old-timey sensationalist headlines while having jokey but accurate content on the inside. In some cases it’s plainly wrong, but I give this one site an exception cuz I love their brand of humor.
- bitcuration 3y agoIt is because 22H2 will make your windows 10 so slow (unlike any previous updates) that you ended up having to upgrade the hardware and then go to Windows 11. I knew this because it happened to me yesterday. Everybody knows 22H2 is the last update of Windows 10, from a marketing point it's not meant to make Windows 10 better but make you hate Windows 10. I had my doubt too but sadly I was right.