4 ms·
It could be, but it could also be because he is genuinely worried about the future impact of runaway capitalism without guardrails + AI.
by bostonsre 3y ago
It could be, but it could also be because he is genuinely worried about the future impact of runaway capitalism without guardrails + AI.
- ipaddr 3y agoThen the government should takeover OpenAI
- hkt 3y agoOr end capitalism! One or the other!
- bostonsre 3y agoOr.. the government could try to apply sensible regulations so that OpenAI and other corporations are less likely to harm society.
- ipaddr 3y agoThen the government has to spend so much time/money enforcing the rules. When there are few players cutting out the middlemen provides more value
- bostonsre 3y agoI don't think nationalizing AI corporations is feasible (doubt its legal as well) or in the best interests of the united states. It will handicap development of AI, we will lose our head start, and other countries like China will be able to take the lead. What value do you see nationalization providing? Generally its done by countries that are having their natural resources extracted by foreign companies and taking all the profits for themselves. Nationalizing lets them take the profits for their country. I'm not sure how it would work for knowledge based companies like OpenAI.