It would be nice if the naysayers could offer an argument in favor of it being "just" bayesian inference, or even explain what it would mean for it to be more t

It would be nice if the naysayers could offer an argument in favor of it being "just" bayesian inference, or even explain what it would mean for it to be more than just statistics or bayesian inference. There is reason to believe these models are demonstrating the traits of understanding in some cases. I argue the point in some detail here: https://www.reddit.com/r/naturalism/comments/1236vzf https://www.reddit.com/r/naturalism/comments/1236vzf