> I think the problem is cultural, not technological. I'm sure that's true. You don't have to write classes with names like DoubleFactoryFactory; nobody does t

> I think the problem is cultural, not technological. I'm sure that's true. You don't have to write classes with names like DoubleFactoryFactory; nobody does that in other languages. It's a tribal thing. What's amusing (to me) is that Java isn't actually object-oriented, because many of the core datatypes aren't objects.