4 ms·
I maintain a list of tunneling solutions[0]. One of the main reasons people choose not to use Cloudflare Tunnel for selfhosting is because technically hosting n
by anderspitman 3y ago
I maintain a list of tunneling solutions[0]. One of the main reasons people choose not to use Cloudflare Tunnel for selfhosting is because technically hosting non-HTML content has been against their ToS. Anyone know if this change affects tunnels?
[0]: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling
- napsterbr 3y agoApparently, there are no "service-specific terms" for Cloudflare Tunnel, so the only ToS for that service would be the "main" terms (i.e. the Self-Serve Subscription Agreement)[0]. Therefore, as long as you comply with it (especially the sections 2.2.1 and 2.7), you'd be fine. There are no explicit constraints regarding content type, just on what the content itself is or represents (e.g. illegal stuff). Disclaimer: I'm definitely not a lawyer. [0] - https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/ https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/
- Wallacy 3y agoTunnels should be part of Cloudflare Access and they mention "GRE tunnels" and WARP with not mention about content type or bandwidth limit.