3 ms·
I still use the "vanilla" stuff. GPT-4 has been superior to Phind in my experience, especially on technical questions. And the web browsing beta closes all the
by muzani 3y ago
I still use the "vanilla" stuff.
GPT-4 has been superior to Phind in my experience, especially on technical questions. And the web browsing beta closes all the holes remaining. Downside is speed, but it's a fire and forget thing.
I tried AutoGPT and the like, but found the self-iteration not very helpful when tackling real world problems. GPT-4 gives enough step-by-step instructions to do anything I need it to do, without it being wired into my file system.
Prompt engineering seems to be a thing of the past with GPT-4 too, though you still need to give context, which "prompt engineering tools" don't help with.
Plugins are also pretty powerful. It seems to hallucinate a lot with Zapier, but it's still the best tool by far.
- softwaredoug 3y agoAgree on AutoGPT. It’s more useful for me to share what happened and ask follow up questions. Also sometimes it simply is bad at something, and putting it in an AutoGPT loop just makes things more confusing :). At that point I just use google.