3 ms·
I don't see this as an issue. Sure, there are expensive stuff that get advertised which poor people are shy to spend money on. But there are lots of stuff tha
by rg111 3y ago
I don't see this as an issue.
Sure, there are expensive stuff that get advertised which poor people are shy to spend money on.
But there are lots of stuff that poor people do buy. Like toothpaste, mobile phones, shoes, clothes, dishwashers, deodrant, soft drinks.
Although these stuff are cheap, they are billion dollar industries.
And manikng a lot of people switch from one toothpaste to another will make a company a lot of money.
- SturgeonsLaw 3y agoThe thing about low income earners is that they spend pretty much 100% of the money they make, and there are a lot of them
- hiatus 3y agoYes but you are thinking that the ads would lead to increased spend instead of redirecting spend to the advertised alternatives.