3 ms·
To be blunt, the code you copied out as example is crap. I don't know what you expect how it's being interpreted. It says more about the programmer than the l
by ww520 3y ago
To be blunt, the code you copied out as example is crap. I don't know what you expect how it's being interpreted. It says more about the programmer than the language.
> functions returning closures with mutable captures
That sounds like another bad design, but to each his own.
- sgtnoodle 3y agoMy apologies if I hit a nerve. I'm just trying to have fun chatting about the foibles of contemporary software development with fellow nerds on HN. I expected something like urthor's post, where they seemed to appreciate the levity of my comment, and responded with some interesting insights. I also appreciated the follow up comment raising a serious concern about the prevalence of cloning and resulting confusion in realistic codebases.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]